- The Royal Family: Theoden, Theodred (no throwing spears), Eomer (no throwing spears), and Eowyn (no throwing spears)
- Supporting Named Heroes: Elfhelm, Grimbold, Gamling, Hama (no extra gear), Haleth, Aldor, Erkenbrand, Eorl the Young, Helm Hammerhand
- Generic Heroes: 3 Captains of Rohan with shields, 1 Captain of Rohan on horse with shield
- Also, we have at least 1 King's Huntsman because we bought at least one command blister
- Infantry Warriors: 36 Warriors of Rohan (12 shields, 12 throwing spears and shields, 12 bows), 12 Rohan Royal Guards with throwing spears
- +13 Warriors of Rohan if you collect everything you need for the big Battle of Helm's Deep scenario
- You also have 1 war horn (with shield and throwing spear) and 1 banner from the command blister along with 1 banner and 1 war horn from Grimbold's command blister
- Mounted Warriors: 24 Riders of Rohan (8 with throwing spears), 3 Rohan Outriders on horses, 12 Rohan Royal Guards on horses with throwing spears, 6 Sons of Eorl
- You also have 1 Rider of Rohan with banner from the mounted command blister
"...we put the thought of all that we love into all that we make." ~Wood Elf Leader, The Fellowship of the Ring
Pages
Featured Post
So It Begins, Part 2: The Walls of Helm's Deep
Good morning gamers, We're back for another scenario in our custom Helm's Deep campaign. Today, the Uruk-Hai have made it to the wal...
Monday, February 13, 2023
War in Rohan Inspired Lists: Theodred's Guard LL Revisited
Saturday, February 11, 2023
Fantasy Fellowships: The Erebor Reunion, Part 1
- Ringbearer: Old Bilbo Baggins with Sting and the Mithril Coat
- Companion: Farmer Maggot with Grip, Fang, and Wolf
- Rohan-bound Friend: Bofur the Dwarf
- Gondor-bound Friend: Bifur the Dwarf
Thursday, February 9, 2023
War in Rohan: What Models Do You Need?
![]() |
| Photo Credit: Warhammer Community |
Monday, February 6, 2023
FAQ Time: Breaking Down the February 2023 FAQ
Good morning gamers,
I happen to be on vacation, but that doesn't stop me from checking out what's new in the SBG community - and at the top of the list is the newest dump of FAQs. As the first set of FAQs since the release of the Battle of Osgiliath box set and the updated rulebook, I was excited to see what changes were in store (and whether the old rulebook would continue to be supported now that we have a new one). You can find the article here and the FAQ page here. Let's dig in and see what changed!
![]() |
| Photo Credit: Reddit No matter how many times I tell myself to play it cool , I just can't stop myself from looking for the questions I asked . . . |
General Observations
First off, there were no updates for the Gondor at War, Scouring of the Shire, War in Rohan, Quest of the Ringbearer, or Fall of the Necromancer sourcebooks - apparently, these have been hashed out enough and we're just focused on the Defence of the North and the quadrumvirate of necessary sourcebooks (the main rulebook, the Armies of the Lord of the Rings, the Armies of the Hobbit, and the Matched Play Guide). Check out these pages if you want, but there's nothing new there (much to pity - I asked for some things in these).
There were only two erratas (and no FAQs) in the Armies of the Lord of the Rings book - one of which I asked for and totally expected to make it in without my input and one that I didn't ask for, wish I'd asked for, and am thrilled made it in (but more on this later).
There were four FAQs from the main rulebook that, apparently, didn't make it into the rules rewrite - these include what makes a model count as "trapped" (e.g. you can't just be fighting a cavalry model that charged you), what a model can do when they're transfixed (the infamous "degree of common sense" FAQ), the need to measure vertical distance when using Swift Movement, and the need for making a scatter roll when using Severed Heads.
Finally (and alluded to in the previous point), the main rulebook FAQ was truncated to just what hasn't been covered since the new rulebook release. This . . . was kind of expected on my part, but I also wish hadn't happened. For version control (and to promote a new product), it makes sense that the Middle-Earth team has done away with the old rulebook FAQs - but if they'd kept the old main rulebook FAQs as a static document and provided the new one as well, then players wouldn't have to buy the new sourcebook . . . which, I guess would translate into less profit for them. Still, the new rulebook was advertised as an incorporation of the old FAQs - and now it's required because the old FAQs don't exist.
Okay, with that, let's get into one of the shortest FAQ releases we've seen to date!




