Fantasy Fellowship Deep Dive, Part 6

Good morning gamers,

We come to it at last, the big battle of our time! Indeed, in Fantasy Fellowships, the saga of the siege of Gondor is actually split into four missions (all of which are found in Gondor at War and NOT in Quest of the Ringbearer). While our last segment focused on the journey of Frodo and Sam through the Dead Marshes, Ithilien, the pass of Cirith Ungol, and the plains of Gorgoroth, our journey today returns to the six other living Fellowship members and their part in the struggle at Minas Tirith. Let's dig into it!

Part 6: The Pelennor Sequence 

Photo Credit: Gondor at War

We're almost done with Fantasy Fellowships and this part, like Part 3 (the Amon Hen to Helm's Deep missions) basically has 1-2 missions for different groups of your Fellowships. As such, this is one of the few parts where your scenarios can be played out of order and everything is fine (just remember to play Atop the Walls before Denethor's Madness). Certain scenarios in Part 3 can be played out of order (whether you do Warg Attack before Ambush at Night doesn't actually matter) and you can play Eomer's Return from Part 4 before the other two scenarios if you want to (The Deeping Wall is Breached and Ride Out), but Part 6 is by far and away the most flexible - which is good if you need to juggle tables among several players. Our four scenarios are (mostly) filled with allies and we get to use the following models: 

• Merry (1 scenario) 
• Pippin (2 scenarios) 
• Aragorn (1 scenario) 
• Legolas (1 scenario) 
• Gimli (1 scenario) 
• Gandalf (2 scenarios) 
• ALLIES: 
• Irolas (1 scenario) 
• Beregond (2 scenarios) 
• Theoden with everything (1 scenario) 
• Eomer with everything (1 scenario) 
• Dernhelm (1 scenario) 
• Gamling with everything (1 scenario) 
• Deorwine (1 scenario, probably supposed to have a horse) 
• Elfhelm with everything (1 scenario) 
• Captain of Rohan on horse (1 scenario) 
• The King of the Dead (1 scenario) 
• 24 Warriors of Minas Tirith (standard gear) 
• 24 Riders of Rohan (1 scenario, standard gear) 
• 20 Warriors of the Dead (1 scenario, no war gear) 
• 6 Riders of the Dead (1 scenario) 

That's a lot of guys - most of the scenarios have 24+ warriors and all have 1+ allied heroes. The foes we'll be facing are (mostly) F3 warriors and F4 heroes (mostly without Heroic Strike): 

• Zagdush (1 scenario, F4 with Strike) 
• Gothmog (1 scenario, F5 with Strike) 
• Gothmog's Enforcer (1 scenario) 
• 2 Orc Captains with shields (1 scenario) 
• 3 Morannon Orc Captains with shields (1-2 scenarios) 
• Denethor (1 scenario, F5 without Strike) 
• Guritz (1 scenario) 
• 36 Orc Warriors (1 scenario, standard gear) 
• 36 Morannon Orcs (2 scenarios, standard gear) 
• 4 Citadel Guard (1 scenario, F4) 

Thoughts on the War in Rohan Siege Scenarios

Good morning gamers,

The Matched Play scenarios give players a lot of different ways to play an MESBG game - with eighteen scenarios in the Matched Play Guide, you can have scenarios where you try to control parts of the board, kill off certain heroes, or "just kill things." No matter what your preferred style of play is, there's a scenario that's probably going to work out well for you.

But the one kind of scenario that isn't available in Matched Play is a siege scenario. There are rules for fighting sieges in the main rulebook and additional rules that were provided in the War in Rohan supplement, which included two scenarios - but the Matched Play experience is siege-free, and I think most players like it that way. I mean, the walls can make things really one-sided, right?

Well, I decided to test this theory by running a tournament using the siege rules/scenarios provided in the War in Rohan book (with a few modifications) and after MANY games of defending walls and villages (and attacking them), I have quite a few thoughts on how siege games work, what really doesn't work in a siege game, and ideas for how to take what GW has given us and turn it into a fun tournament-play experience. Let's dig in!

Siege Scenarios

There are two siege scenarios in the War in Rohan supplement - one for attacking a wall-less village (Defend the Village) and one for attacking a city with a wall (The Grand Siege). The fact that there are two scenarios you can play (one with a wall, one without one) is incredibly good, as it allows all-cavalry armies to participate in siege events without having to worry about dismounting to carry battering rams or climbing walls.

If you plan to run a siege event, I would highly recommend that you change the scoring requirements - the Grand Siege scenario is not optimized for event play and minor tweaks to the Defend the Village scenario would be recommended as well (though they are much less necessary).

Nemesis: How To Fight The Balrog

Good morning gamers,

We're kicking off a new series here at TMAT today: Nemesis! I've been planning this series for a while now and it was born, actually, out of the In Defense Of series (where we take models that lots of players think are worthless or "bad" and explore how valuable they can be/how to make them work).

Nemesis tries to do something similar: we're going to be looking at models that lots of players say are "too good" or "unfun" or "unfair" or "overpowered" or "pick-your-favorite-phrase-that-means-there's-something-insanely-too-good-about-it" and explore how to beat those models. Sometimes these models will have a Legendary Legion, an army bonus, or an alliance that causes them to go from "fine/fair" to "too good/overpowered" and when that's the case, we'll flag it in the article.

Our first stop happens to be one of my favorite models and one that, when run well, can REALLY ruin your day. Yes, it's Devin Moreno's least favorite model in the game: the Balrog. This guy is not only one of the most expensive models in the game (and tied for most expensive model available to the Moria faction), but he's also the figurehead of one of the most feared Evil Legendary Legions in the game. Let's see what's up with this big guy that makes playing against him so unfun.

What Makes The Balrog So Hated?

Photo Credit: Warhammer Community 

The Balrog begins with unparalleled stats: he's F10 (innately higher than any other model in the game), he's S9/D9 (so Rending doesn't help enemy monsters wound him more easily and he's wounded on 6s or worse by basically everything in the game), he's got 4 Attacks (on-par with most big heroes when they're mounted and on the charge, better than most other heroes), 10 Wounds (less than Smaug, sure, but on-par with Mumaks and better than anyone else), 10 Will and Resistant to Magic (because locking down monsters with magic is a good idea), and C7 with Fearless (because, you know, why not have both).  His only real "down-side" in his core stats is his 6" movement, which is "fine" on a 60mm base, but can mean that getting his positioning requires some thinking. Not having any Might points or Fate points is also a knock to the profile, but as we'll see in a moment, there are mitigations for this.

Thoughts on the German Scoring System

Good morning gamers,

As a preliminary note, the blog just passed the 2 million (reported) page views mark - from all of us here at TMAT, thanks for taking the time to read what we're posting! 

This past June, we here at TMAT ran our annual Grand Tournament and we decided to use the "German Scoring System" for awarding tournament points instead of our usual 2-to-10 system for major/minor wins/losses (more on this later). The German Scoring System was different and had some very interesting take-aways from our tournament. While there are certainly other players who could weigh in more on how valuable this system is, I wanted to present my review of the system based on the 16 games we had at our event and provide some observations about it. Let's dig in!

What Are The Distinctives of the German Scoring System?

To be pedantic, in most tournaments (especially those in America), players compare their victory points (VPs) and are awarded a victory or loss based on whether one player has more VPs than the other (a victory) or fewer VPs than the other (a loss). These are either "major wins/losses" if one player has double the number of VPs of the other or "minor wins/losses" if one player has more but not double. In many tournament settings, a major victory is only awarded if the winning player scores more than X number of VPs to encourage them to "actually play the scenario". I have recently been implemeting this in our tournaments, requiring 6 VPs to be scored to get a major victory. Without this limitation, a 2-1 victory is awarded the same number of Tournament Points (TPs) as a 7-2 victory or a 12-0 victory.

Depending on whether you get a major/minor victory/loss, you get a certain number of TPs. How many TPs you get for a major/minor win/loss or a draw depends on your tournament, but we here at TMAT have traditionally done 10 points for a major win, 8 points for a minor win, 6 points for a draw, 4 points for a minor loss, and 2 points for a major loss.

If you compare this to the MESBG Matched Play Guide, you'll find on page 5 that it's recommended that a win (any margin) is awarded 3 points, a draw is awarded 1 point, and a loss gets you no points. VPs are used to break ties (first by VP differential, then by total VPs scored). Further tie breakers are recommended here as well, including most enemy army leaders killed, number of secret objectives completed, or favorite opponent rankings. This is different from what we do, mostly because I feel it has less granularity (and because ending your day with 0 TPs sounds cruel to me).

With the German Scoring System, however, there are 20 points up for grabs and they're allocated between the players based on how many Victory Points they receive in the round. Here's what the grid looks like (and for more information on this grid, check out the Unexpected Podcast episode on this subject - it's excellent):

As you can see, the scoring for this is going to be . . . huge. Very huge - especially if one side dominates and the other gets slammed. But what advantages are there for this kind of system? Well, let's take a look at some of the reasons that we found . . .

Armies of Middle-Earth SBG: The Kingdom of Moria in the Middle-Earth Strategy Battle Game

And they say Gimli wasn't in Moria...

Photo credit: Quora.com

Something something something BALIN!!!

So there's more to this list than just Balin, of course (FLOI!!!). But if you're opting for the Kingdom of Moria instead of a generic Khazad-Dum list, you're by definition opting for Balin (and his mates) instead of Durin (and his mate). As we'll discuss in the rest of this write-up, that's not a bad thing (Balin is good, and a couple of his mates are great). But that's the trade-off.

Having said that, apart from the changes to the hero suite (two subtractions, five additions) and alliance matrix (which is all Red), you don't lose really any of the options in Khazad-Dum... which means that if you came over here after reading our army summary of Khazad-Dum, you're going to see a lot of repetition. I've tried to front-load some of the differences to save you time... but as much as I love you guys, I wasn't going to re-write everything I've already rewritten.

Baruk Khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!

Army Quick(ish) Hits

• Strength: A solid (though restricted) suite of heroes. Believe it or not, Moria actually has a better suite of heroes than Khazad-Dum does. Yes, your top-end talent is limited (Kingdom of Moria has no power-curve equivalent to Durin), but apart from Durin, the only other model you absolutely can't take is Mardin... and let's be honest, even most Khazad-Dum players weren't going to take Mardin unless the points level is very high. Every other hero, however, is on the table. Dwarf Captains provide that all-important Heroic March, which you will usually want because (a) dwarves move only 5" base, (b) this particular dwarf army has no cavalry options, and (c) Durin, unlike Balin, doesn't have access to Heroic March for some reason. At Fight 5, Strength 4, and Defense 7 base (8 with shield), they're also reliable tanks when they aren't pushing your army from place to place. If you'd like to double-down on your support role to get both speed and magic defense, Dwarf Kings have access to Heroic March and Heroic Resolve, with an extra point of Will (2/2/1 Heroic Stats), higher Fight (F6), and base Defense 8. Plus, with the errata, they're now Heroes of Valour, with the ability to bring up to 15 warriors (and ally with other yellow/red factions... which is all of them). The Dwarf Shieldbearer offers a way to buff your force's global courage in the absence of Bodyguard, while also offering a buff to some of your combat pieces with his ability to call free Heroic Combats sometimes (In Defense of the King). Last but not least, the King's Champion is one of the best generic heroes in the game, capable of slaying heroes or troops (F6, S5, 3 Attacks, and Heroic Strike with 2/1/1 Heroic Stats) or tanking something really nasty (2 Wounds, D7-9, and 1-5 Fate, depending on where his supporting Heralds are). Oh, and he comes with two heralds with two 3" banners included in his points cost, for fewer points than a Great Beast of Gorgoroth. Finally, Kingdom of Moria gets access to four additional heroes to help take the "sting" out of losing Durin (and Mardin):